Bad Beats / Lucky Wins (September 20)


In what seems like a lifetime ago, I made the following statement on a vegas radio series in the late 1980s, “The referees are on the field to guarantee that the players don’t determine the outcome of the game!” While during that time I made the quote “tongue-in-cheek,” period has proven that maybe it’s time to take out my tongue of my cheek?
Each Wednesday I see the past weekend’s games in that I touch on any range of this “Bad Beats and Lucky Wins” in both college and pro football. While there were lots of bad beats and blessed wins this CFB weekend (and a number at the NFL as well), beginning with the Kansas/Toledo game on Friday (incidentally, if you had Kansas you got robbed-I’d Toledo!) , I want to change my focus for this week’s column.

This past CFB weekend saw SEVEN games รับพนันบอล between teams ranked in the AP pollthat the most-ever on a single day as the AP began including 25 teams at its position in 1969. It should’ve already been a memorable afternoon but it turned into my embarrassment.

BYU played in Boston College in a 12 noon ET beginning even though both teams had a opportunity to win in law, the playoff official ‘stole’ a triumph for BC in the second OT period. Down 30-23, BYU had a pass virtually dialing by BC on its own potential game-tying drive. The MWC official on the field ruled incomplete because the ball hit on the ground first. From the booth, with no resembling Allergic evidence, the ACC official overturned the call, giving the win to the home (ACC) team. Additionally, it gave Boston College the ATS win.

LSU was denied that a first-and-goal late in the fourth quarter when the replay official overturned the turn to the area. The playoff man said Auburn’s pass-interference happened after the trick and also therefore had been allowable. However, replays clearly revealed the end coming AFTER the disturbance. Auburn needs to have been punished and LSU awarded the very first down. Auburn held on to win 7-3, laying 3 1/2 points.

On a weekend of bad officiating, the Oklahoma/Oregon game had the worst of the worst. In that match, officials had two opportunities to find yourself a replay right but missed both calls. Oregon volunteered using a last-minute touch down and an extremely controversial 34-33 triumph (Oregon was favored by 4 1/2 or five things, so the ATS winner was not effected). Here’s how it stopped.

Oregon trailed 33-20 but scored with 1:16 remaining in the match to close to 33-27. Oregon tried an onside kick but a Duck player c-l-e-a-r-l-y cried with the ball until it’d opted the mandatory 10 yards. Nevertheless, the replay officials missed telephone and gave Oregon possession. The crime nevertheless, was that whether the ball did or perhaps not move the required 10 yards was irrelevant (it did not!) , because the ball has been recovered with an Oklahoma player anyway! .

That usually means that the hindrance was allowable but only if officials saw that the tip. Of course they overlooked it on the field, as well! From the replay booth, staring at precisely the exact same re-play you personally and that I saw, they missed it again!

The replay official reportedly lives in Portland. Now I’m not planning to say that the playoff official from Oregon intentionally missed just two calls to reap Oregon, because that would make him a cheater. But, I am saying the replay official from Oregon missed two calls despite irrefutable proof! What exactly does that make him? Incompetent, I figure. In all three of the above mentioned circumstances, the mistakes gained your home group, or your home team’s conference (which divides the officials).

It seems fair for me personally, we must question. Do officials become caught up in the moment, at the excitement, and reduce their composure and their competence? Do subconscious biases and only their league’s schools affect what they are seeing their own eyes? All these are ugly questions which the NCAA wishes we mightn’t ask. However, they are questions which, after last weekend, we have to ask!

“Errors clearly were made rather than corrected, and for that we apologize for the University of Oklahoma, coach Bob Stoops and his players,” pac10 Commissioner Tom Hansen said in a statement. “They played an outstanding college football game, as did Oregon, and it’s regrettable that the end result of the competition was affected by the officiating.” Both replay official and also the officers were suspended for a match.

Wonderful try Tom. The trouble is, Oklahoma’s been saddled with a devastating loss while Oregon not just gets an undeserved win but is rewarded with moving up from No. 18 from the Coaches’ poll to No. 12, while Oklahoma dropped from No. 11 to No. 16. If you never know, the coaches’ poll makes up one third of a schools’ BCS ranking. No apology can alter those facts.

I began this piece using one of my memorable quotes and I will close it with the best one I watched this past weekend. He opined “Eliminate playoffs completely — on the field, off the subject, within my family room, anyplace. Why? Because I’d rather THINK the officials are still blowing a match than KNOW IT! . Well stated Gregg!

You may also like

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *